AUDIT of a QUANTUM MECHANICS

The problems solving of a quantum mechanics is obtained by a classic way or with the help of a corpuscular quantum mechanics In this chapter we shall analyze fundamentals of a modern quantum mechanics. It as a matter of fact not corpuscular and wave. Will be shown, that though it and operates with mass and energy of a particle, as a matter of fact properties of particles in it are skipped in a favour to wave properties. In this case it is easy to receive quantum system conditions, stands only legally or clandestinely to present a particle as a standing wave. Thus find explanation some experimental facts which are not explained by classic mechanics. Simultaneously there are outcomes, not having physical sense. For example, any bound particle in a wave quantum mechanics appears disjointed on separate slices and spread on space, since a particle is not present there, where the wave function is peer to zero point (in nodes of a standing wave) and is spread in space, where the wave function is different from zero point (in antinodes of a standing wave). Particle, bound with a standing wave, too is immobile, though can be in a force field and should move. But then the standing wave is transformed into a traveling wave and quantumness of levels of energy at once disappears. Besides constant originating of perpetuities at calculations, from which one it is necessary by hook or by crook to liquidate, literally martyrs a wave quantum mechanics. New physics connects wave properties of particles to motion them on a screw line. A reason of such trajectory is the originating of a gravidynamic field at motion of gravitational charges. On the basis of it is possible to call new physics as a corpuscular quantum mechanics as against an official wave quantum mechanics. Thus, now in our disposal will be a wave quantum mechanics, classic mechanics and corpuscular quantum mechanics. Further we compare these three approaches in the indicated sequence to physical phenomena and we shall see, with what of them not conflicts with sensible physical sense. Comments of the author: 1. Classic and quantum physics. The familiarization with properties of a microcosmos has provoked large doubts in applicability of the laws of classic physics, quantum physics as a result of which has appeared. The scientists, nostalgic till now on «clean» classic physics are easy are to understood with replacement necessarian of the description of a world by the probabilistic description causes the internal protest against «divine heaven». But also they should understand, that classic physics irrevocably has sink into oblivion and any attempts to reanimate it in a primitive kind are useless. An alone path to return in physics common sense considerably «to correct» classic physics, essentially, to elaborate neoclassic physics grounded on a principle of determinism, tested by centuries. The quantum physics is founded on the probabilistic description of a world. We, certainly, can use a law of probability for statistical of the description of composite events, but to forecast, for example, what party the thrown coin will fall by it is impossible to forecast with probability more than 0.5. Now we shall throw this coin and with probability to equal unit it will fall by that party, which one we see after a throw. Thus, after the event has taken place,its probability is peer to unit. Therefore all our speculations and calculations before event are fiction. The same fiction is also probabilistic description of a world, i.e. quantum wave physics is mock-science, causing us in fallacy. At any moment of time any particle of a microcosmos is in a strictly definite place and has definite speed. That there is with it through instant official physics in accuracy does not know, and its probabilistic suppositions nothing cost, since with probability to equal unit will not coincide that will happen through this instant. 2. The quantum mechanics does not have foundation. The creators of a quantum mechanics supposed, that its foundation can be served with formation of a standing wave in microsystems, bound with wave properties of particles. Then the integer values of quantum system conditions are easily explained, but here there is a principled difficulty, which one does not allow to realise this idea. I shall remind indispensable conditions of originating of a standing wave. The standing waves are a particular case of an interference as a result of superposition of two waves distributed in opposite directions with identical frequency, polarization (for shear waves) and identical amplitude in applicable coordinate. In a standing wave there is absent a carry of energy, since a straight and backward wave transfer energy in equal quantities. At violation of any of listed conditions the formation of a standing wave is impossible. Nevertheless, official physics applies a Schrodinger equation in all cases, when the formation of a standing wave is impossible. As in substantial microsystems anywhere there are no vertical walls of a potential well, the reflected wave can not be diffused in a direction dropping. For example, in atom the spherically symmetric electrostatic field of a nucleus has not anywhere not vertical «walls», by consideration of «tunnel» effect the reflected wave can not have amplitude dropping, therefore formation of a standing wave is impossible. This principled difficulty of a quantum mechanics its creators is fine understood, therefore considered the extremely invented unreal model systems with vertical walls of a potential well, and the conclusions of such consideration suffered on real systems. It is a not scientific method of investigations. What for creators of a quantum mechanics (which one are considered as the great scientists) neglected scientific bona fides for the good of achievement of the purpose? The answer is not present. There is an alone suspicion, that the mankind periodically is struck by a global stupefaction on unknowns to reasons (almost simultaneously with a quantum mechanics there were two world wars, revolution, civil war and relativity theory). Motion of a free particle and indeterminacy relations of the Heisenberg Wave quantum mechanics. Uncertainty of the Heisenberg: ∆Px∆x≥h (1) is possible for considered one-dimensional problem to copy as: ∆P∆x≥h (2). If we precisely find out value of a impulse of a particle (∆P=0), pursuant to (2) ∆x=∞ and the particle with equal probability is in any place of an infinite axis x. Though probability to meet a particle on all infinite axis x is peer to 1 (particle is, but it spread on all axis) the probability to meet it in any point xi is peer to zero point (1/∞=0), i.e. in any point of an axis of a particle is not present. This irresolvable within the framework of common sense an inconsistency. If to take into account, that in a considered case a projection of a impulse to an axis y and the axis z is peer to zero point, and ∆Py and ∆Pz also are peer to zero point and then the particle is spread on all infinite space. As a matter of fact, the indeterminacy relations of the Heisenberg prohibit any interplay of microparticles. Let's consider, for example, collision of particles in colliding beams. Apparently, that the collision of two particles takes place in a definite point of space, but then impulses (and the energy) these particles indefinitely large and was not of sense them to accelerate. If “collides” two particles with definite impulses, the probability of their meeting is peer to zero point, since they with equal probability can be found in all infinite space. Same concerns and to an exchange interaction by means of virtual particles. Thus, the ratio of the Heisenberg, explaining originating of virtual particles, simultaneously deprive their aptitude somehow to exhibit themselves, that is possible only through interplays. The indeterminacy relations of the Heisenberg contradict a relativity theory, that is confirmed by the following quotation (Physical encyclopedia under edition A.M. Prohorov, т.3, M, 1992, page 494): «The main concept of a relativity theory the event, under which one is understood something occurring in the given instant in the given point of space (for example, light flash or concurrence of a finger of a device with a point). The substantial events have a final expansion in space and time, therefore concept of event of a relativity theory is idealization. The experiment demonstrates, that the applicability of this idealization is very high, down to spacing intervals ~10 cm and times ~10 sec». Apparently, that the same experiment disclaims indeterminacy relations. Classic mechanics. Here contradictions do not arise. Knowing initial velocity and traffic route, we can precisely calculate a trajectory of motion of a particle and always we shall point, when and where it to meet. Corpuscular quantum mechanics. The physical sense of uncertainty of the Heisenberg was uncovered in the previous chapter. If we precisely know a projection of a impulse of a particle to an axis x, along which one it is gone (figure 3.1.1), uncertainty of a position of the particle: r x π 2 = ∆ (3) is peer to a wavelength de Broglie or circumference of cross section of a screw trajectory. Tangential and forward speed of a particle on a screw trajectory are peer, therefore projection of a impulse to traffic route is always constant and is peer: 2 P Px = (4). On the other hand, angular momentum of a particle: r P mvr = = h (5). Allowing, that π 2 / h = h and substituting (3) and (4) in (5), we shall discover: